↓ Skip to main content

Wernicke’s Encephalopathy and Korsakoff’s Syndrome Revisited

Overview of attention for article published in Neuropsychology Review, May 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
58 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Wernicke’s Encephalopathy and Korsakoff’s Syndrome Revisited
Published in
Neuropsychology Review, May 2012
DOI 10.1007/s11065-012-9205-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Edith V. Sullivan, Rosemary Fama

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 58 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 2%
Ireland 1 2%
Australia 1 2%
Unknown 55 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 9 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 12%
Researcher 7 12%
Other 5 9%
Student > Postgraduate 5 9%
Other 15 26%
Unknown 10 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 18 31%
Medicine and Dentistry 14 24%
Neuroscience 4 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 3%
Social Sciences 2 3%
Other 6 10%
Unknown 12 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 May 2016.
All research outputs
#7,452,489
of 22,783,848 outputs
Outputs from Neuropsychology Review
#229
of 454 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54,269
of 163,934 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neuropsychology Review
#7
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,783,848 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 454 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.1. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 163,934 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.