↓ Skip to main content

Prayer: A Helpful Aid in Recovery from Depression

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Religion and Health, January 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
9 X users
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
90 Mendeley
Title
Prayer: A Helpful Aid in Recovery from Depression
Published in
Journal of Religion and Health, January 2018
DOI 10.1007/s10943-018-0564-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kirk A. Johnson

Abstract

Depression is a growing issue within the field of medicine. It negatively impacts individuals' lives and the people they are most connected to. For decades, medical professionals have been searching for solutions to assist those who are suffering from this illness. The use of drugs has not been a sufficient means of treatment to alleviate depression and its symptoms. There is a dire need to expand therapeutic interventions that can attribute meaningful recovery for victims of depression. One means of positive treatment is the use of prayer. Prayer, one of the most ancient forms of meditation, aligns and relaxes the mental state of the mind. The uses of drugs are limited by physiological focus, but prayer is a mechanism that brings human beings into a unique state of oneness. Oneness comprises the holistic nature of a human being and asserts the triad of well-being: mind, body, and spirit. As the emergence of humanities and holism continues in medicine, centering/meditative prayer and similar practices like mindfulness-based cognitive therapy can be useful therapeutic interventions specifically for major depressed patients.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 90 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 90 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 13 14%
Student > Bachelor 13 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 9%
Researcher 4 4%
Other 13 14%
Unknown 30 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 28 31%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 8%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 3%
Neuroscience 2 2%
Other 10 11%
Unknown 28 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 July 2023.
All research outputs
#6,871,497
of 25,715,849 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Religion and Health
#316
of 1,358 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#128,554
of 451,489 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Religion and Health
#8
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,715,849 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,358 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 451,489 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.