↓ Skip to main content

The frequency of missed breast cancers in women participating in a high-risk MRI screening program

Overview of attention for article published in Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, January 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
twitter
12 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
34 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
65 Mendeley
Title
The frequency of missed breast cancers in women participating in a high-risk MRI screening program
Published in
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, January 2018
DOI 10.1007/s10549-018-4688-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

S. Vreemann, A. Gubern-Merida, S. Lardenoije, P. Bult, N. Karssemeijer, K. Pinker, R. M. Mann

Abstract

To evaluate the frequency of missed cancers on breast MRI in women participating in a high-risk screening program. Patient files from women who participated in an increased risk mammography and MRI screening program (2003-2014) were coupled to the Dutch National Cancer Registry. For each cancer detected, we determined whether an MRI scan was available (0-24 months before cancer detection), which was reported to be negative. These negative MRI scans were in consensus re-evaluated by two dedicated breast radiologists, with knowledge of the cancer location. Cancers were scored as invisible, minimal sign, or visible. Additionally, BI-RADS scores, background parenchymal enhancement, and image quality (IQ; perfect, sufficient, bad) were determined. Results were stratified by detection mode (mammography, MRI, interval cancers, or cancers in prophylactic mastectomies) and patient characteristics (presence of BRCA mutation, age, menopausal state). Negative prior MRI scans were available for 131 breast cancers. Overall 31% of cancers were visible at the initially negative MRI scan and 34% of cancers showed a minimal sign. The presence of a BRCA mutation strongly reduced the likelihood of visible findings in the last negative MRI (19 vs. 46%, P < 0.001). Less than perfect IQ increased the likelihood of visible findings and minimal signs in the negative MRI (P = 0.021). This study shows that almost one-third of cancers detected in a high-risk screening program are already visible at the last negative MRI scan, and even more in women without BRCA mutations. Regular auditing and double reading for breast MRI screening is warranted.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 65 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 65 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 14%
Student > Master 9 14%
Other 6 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 9%
Student > Bachelor 2 3%
Other 10 15%
Unknown 23 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 14%
Engineering 7 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 9%
Computer Science 2 3%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 3%
Other 7 11%
Unknown 32 49%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 November 2018.
All research outputs
#1,519,362
of 23,018,998 outputs
Outputs from Breast Cancer Research and Treatment
#190
of 4,683 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,663
of 440,194 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Breast Cancer Research and Treatment
#5
of 76 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,018,998 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,683 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 440,194 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 76 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.