↓ Skip to main content

Scabies: more than just an irritation

Overview of attention for article published in Postgraduate Medical Journal, July 2004
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
2 X users
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
166 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
201 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Scabies: more than just an irritation
Published in
Postgraduate Medical Journal, July 2004
DOI 10.1136/pgmj.2003.014563
Pubmed ID
Authors

J S McCarthy, D J Kemp, S F Walton, B J Currie

Abstract

Human scabies, caused by skin infestation with the arthropod mite, Sarcoptes scabiei, typically results in a papular, intensely pruritic eruption involving the interdigital spaces, and flexure creases. Recent research has led to a reassessment of the morbidity attributable to this parasite in endemic communities, particularly resulting from secondary skin sepsis and postinfective complications including glomerulonephritis. This has led to studies of the benefits of community based control programmes, and to concerns regarding the emergence of drug resistance when such strategies are employed. The renewed research interest into the biology of this infection has resulted in the application of molecular tools. This has established that canine and human scabies populations are genetically distinct, a finding with major implications for the formulation of public health control policies. Further research is needed to increase understanding of drug resistance, and to identify new drug targets and potential vaccine candidates.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 201 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Ecuador 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 198 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 31 15%
Student > Master 25 12%
Researcher 16 8%
Student > Postgraduate 14 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 7%
Other 29 14%
Unknown 72 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 70 35%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 4%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 7 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 2%
Other 25 12%
Unknown 76 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 28. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 October 2019.
All research outputs
#1,384,886
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Postgraduate Medical Journal
#244
of 3,269 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,519
of 59,643 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Postgraduate Medical Journal
#2
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,269 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 59,643 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.