↓ Skip to main content

Shiga toxin-associated hemolytic uremic syndrome: pathophysiology of endothelial dysfunction

Overview of attention for article published in Pediatric Nephrology, April 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
156 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
102 Mendeley
Title
Shiga toxin-associated hemolytic uremic syndrome: pathophysiology of endothelial dysfunction
Published in
Pediatric Nephrology, April 2010
DOI 10.1007/s00467-010-1522-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Carla Zoja, Simona Buelli, Marina Morigi

Abstract

Shiga toxin (Stx)-producing enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli O157:H7 has become a global threat to public health, as a primary cause of a worldwide spread of hemorrhagic colitis complicated by diarrhea-associated hemolytic uremic syndrome (HUS), a disorder of thrombocytopenia, microangiopathic hemolytic anemia, and acute renal failure that mainly affects early childhood. Endothelial dysfunction has been recognized as the trigger event in the development of microangiopathic processes. Endothelial cells, mainly those located in the renal microvasculature, are primary targets of the toxic effects of Stx1 and 2. Stxs bound to their specific globotriaosylceramide (Gb3Cer) receptor on the cell surface trigger a cascade of signaling events, involving NF-κB activation, that induce expression of genes encoding for adhesion molecules and chemokines, and culminate in the adhesion of leukocytes to endothelial cells, thereby increasing the endothelial susceptibility to leukocyte-mediated injury. Activated endothelial cells in response to Stxs lose the normal thromboresistance phenotype and become thrombogenic, initiating microvascular thrombus formation. Evidence is emerging that complement activation in response to Stxs favors platelet thrombus formation on endothelial cells, which may play a role in amplifying the inflammation-thrombosis circuit in Stx-associated HUS.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 102 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
Czechia 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
Unknown 97 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 19 19%
Researcher 14 14%
Student > Bachelor 13 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 9%
Other 8 8%
Other 21 21%
Unknown 18 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 37 36%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 23 23%
Immunology and Microbiology 7 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 3%
Other 8 8%
Unknown 17 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 December 2017.
All research outputs
#7,452,489
of 22,783,848 outputs
Outputs from Pediatric Nephrology
#1,484
of 3,535 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,418
of 95,518 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pediatric Nephrology
#7
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,783,848 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,535 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 95,518 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.