↓ Skip to main content

Iron–sulfur protein folds, iron–sulfur chemistry, and evolution

Overview of attention for article published in JBIC Journal of Biological Inorganic Chemistry, November 2007
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
220 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
258 Mendeley
citeulike
4 CiteULike
Title
Iron–sulfur protein folds, iron–sulfur chemistry, and evolution
Published in
JBIC Journal of Biological Inorganic Chemistry, November 2007
DOI 10.1007/s00775-007-0318-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jacques Meyer

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 258 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 2%
Germany 4 2%
Finland 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 245 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 84 33%
Researcher 40 16%
Student > Master 27 10%
Student > Bachelor 20 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 5%
Other 33 13%
Unknown 40 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 66 26%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 66 26%
Chemistry 57 22%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 6 2%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 2%
Other 9 3%
Unknown 49 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 April 2024.
All research outputs
#8,882,501
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from JBIC Journal of Biological Inorganic Chemistry
#203
of 696 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,730
of 94,304 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JBIC Journal of Biological Inorganic Chemistry
#6
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 696 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 94,304 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.