↓ Skip to main content

Recent Developments in Young-Earth Creationist Geology

Overview of attention for article published in Science & Education, July 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
16 Mendeley
Title
Recent Developments in Young-Earth Creationist Geology
Published in
Science & Education, July 2008
DOI 10.1007/s11191-008-9162-6
Authors

Timothy H. Heaton

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 6%
Unknown 15 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 4 25%
Other 2 13%
Researcher 2 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 13%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 6%
Other 2 13%
Unknown 3 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Philosophy 2 13%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 13%
Social Sciences 2 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 6%
Other 5 31%
Unknown 2 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 August 2019.
All research outputs
#7,452,489
of 22,783,848 outputs
Outputs from Science & Education
#185
of 749 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,572
of 81,653 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science & Education
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,783,848 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 749 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 81,653 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.