↓ Skip to main content

Fractional flow reserve-guided percutaneous coronary intervention for an intermediate stenosis complicated by a coronary-to-pulmonary artery fistula

Overview of attention for article published in Heart and Vessels, February 2015
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
16 Mendeley
Title
Fractional flow reserve-guided percutaneous coronary intervention for an intermediate stenosis complicated by a coronary-to-pulmonary artery fistula
Published in
Heart and Vessels, February 2015
DOI 10.1007/s00380-015-0641-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tsuyoshi Ito, Shunsuke Murai, Hiroshi Fujita, Tomomitsu Tani, Nobuyuki Ohte

Abstract

A 65-year-old man was referred to our hospital following repetitive chest pain. Invasive coronary angiography showed an intermediate stenosis of the proximal left anterior descending artery (LAD), and a coronary fistula originating distal to the stenosis draining into the main pulmonary artery. To evaluate the functional abnormality arising from the stenosis and coronary steal due to the fistula, fractional flow reserve (FFR) was measured using a pressure wire with pullback recording. The FFR value was 0.74 at the distal LAD, 0.78 distal to the fistula, 0.81 proximal to the fistula (distal to the stenosis), and abruptly increased to 1.0 proximal to the stenosis. Based on these FFR results, percutaneous coronary intervention was performed to the stenosis. After stent placement, the FFR value improved to 0.87 at the distal LAD, and no abrupt pressure gradient was observed beyond the fistula and the stent. FFR-guided intervention with pullback pressure recording could be a useful and practical method to apply in cases with coronary stenosis complicated by coronary fistula in the same vessel.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 6%
Unknown 15 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 4 25%
Researcher 4 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 6%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 4 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 63%
Engineering 2 13%
Unknown 4 25%