↓ Skip to main content

Ancient Missense Mutations in a New Member of the RoRet Gene Family Are Likely to Cause Familial Mediterranean Fever

Overview of attention for article published in Cell, August 1997
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

patent
2 patents
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
1310 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
263 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Ancient Missense Mutations in a New Member of the RoRet Gene Family Are Likely to Cause Familial Mediterranean Fever
Published in
Cell, August 1997
DOI 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)80539-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

The International FMF Consortium

Abstract

Familial Mediterranean fever (FMF) is a recessively inherited disorder characterized by dramatic episodes of fever and serosal inflammation. This report describes the cloning of the gene likely to cause FMF from a 115-kb candidate interval on chromosome 16p. Three different missense mutations were identified in affected individuals, but not in normals. Haplotype and mutational analyses disclosed ancestral relationships among carrier chromosomes in populations that have been separated for centuries. The novel gene encodes a 3.7-kb transcript that is almost exclusively expressed in granulocytes. The predicted protein, pyrin, is a member of a family of nuclear factors homologous to the Ro52 autoantigen. The cloning of the FMF gene promises to shed light on the regulation of acute inflammatory responses.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 263 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 2 <1%
Turkey 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 257 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 45 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 34 13%
Student > Master 29 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 19 7%
Student > Bachelor 19 7%
Other 63 24%
Unknown 54 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 78 30%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 47 18%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 37 14%
Immunology and Microbiology 16 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 2%
Other 15 6%
Unknown 66 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 October 2020.
All research outputs
#5,452,627
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from Cell
#9,816
of 17,169 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,284
of 28,138 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cell
#54
of 97 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17,169 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 59.2. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 28,138 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 97 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.