| Title |
Environmental Stewardship: A Conceptual Review and Analytical Framework
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Environmental Management, January 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00267-017-0993-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Nathan J. Bennett, Tara S. Whitty, Elena Finkbeiner, Jeremy Pittman, Hannah Bassett, Stefan Gelcich, Edward H. Allison |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 94 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 16 | 17% |
| Canada | 12 | 13% |
| Australia | 6 | 6% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 3% |
| Jamaica | 2 | 2% |
| South Africa | 2 | 2% |
| Sweden | 2 | 2% |
| Brazil | 2 | 2% |
| Germany | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 12 | 13% |
| Unknown | 35 | 37% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 56 | 60% |
| Scientists | 35 | 37% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 850 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 850 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 128 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 118 | 14% |
| Researcher | 92 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 61 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 51 | 6% |
| Other | 138 | 16% |
| Unknown | 262 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 189 | 22% |
| Social Sciences | 102 | 12% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 69 | 8% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 40 | 5% |
| Arts and Humanities | 29 | 3% |
| Other | 116 | 14% |
| Unknown | 305 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 79. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 February 2024.
All research outputs
#548,889
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Management
#21
of 2,036 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,881
of 454,511 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Management
#2
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,036 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 454,511 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.