| Title |
Correction to: The Sydney Heart Bank: improving translational research while eliminating or reducing the use of animal models of human heart disease
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biophysical Reviews, February 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s12551-018-0397-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
C. G. dos Remedios, S. P. Lal, A. Li, J. McNamara, A. Keogh, P. S. Macdonald, R. Cooke, E. Ehler, R. Knöll, S. B. Marston, J. Stelzer, H. Granzier, C. Bezzina, S. van Dijk, F. De Man, G. J. M. Stienen, J. Odeberg, F. Pontén, W. A. Linke, J. van der Velden |
| Abstract |
In the original version of this article, the name of one of the authors is not correct. The correct name should be W. A. Linke, which is shown correctly in the authorgroup section above. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 7 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 2 | 29% |
| Professor | 1 | 14% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 1 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 2 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 29% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 14% |
| Design | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 3 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 February 2018.
All research outputs
#20,461,148
of 23,018,998 outputs
Outputs from Biophysical Reviews
#704
of 799 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#377,624
of 440,103 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biophysical Reviews
#18
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,018,998 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 799 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 440,103 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.