↓ Skip to main content

重炭酸透析における症候性低血圧症と酢酸不耐症について

Overview of attention for article published in Nihon Toseki Igakkai Zasshi, January 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
重炭酸透析における症候性低血圧症と酢酸不耐症について
Published in
Nihon Toseki Igakkai Zasshi, January 2016
DOI 10.4009/jsdt.49.483
Authors

小北 克也, 山本 忠司, 山川 智之

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 February 2018.
All research outputs
#19,103,314
of 24,357,902 outputs
Outputs from Nihon Toseki Igakkai Zasshi
#1
of 1 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#277,209
of 402,733 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nihon Toseki Igakkai Zasshi
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,357,902 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 0.0. This one scored the same or higher as 0 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 402,733 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them