↓ Skip to main content

Reclassification of Sphaerobacter thermophilus from the subclass Sphaerobacteridae in the phylum Actinobacteria to the class Thermomicrobia (emended description) in the phylum Chloroflexi (emended…

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology, November 2004
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
12 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
113 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
115 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Reclassification of Sphaerobacter thermophilus from the subclass Sphaerobacteridae in the phylum Actinobacteria to the class Thermomicrobia (emended description) in the phylum Chloroflexi (emended description)
Published in
International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology, November 2004
DOI 10.1099/ijs.0.03028-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Philip Hugenholtz, Erko Stackebrandt

Abstract

Sphaerobacter thermophilus was originally classified as the deepest branching member of the phylum Actinobacteria (high-G+C, Gram-positive bacteria) based on 16S rRNA gene comparative analysis. However, the analysis lacked suitable outgroups, and additional 16S rRNA gene sequences indicate that it is most closely related to Thermomicrobium roseum, which it also resembles phenotypically. Furthermore, both species are reproducibly affiliated with the phylum Chloroflexi (green non-sulfur bacteria), despite T. roseum currently being classified in its own phylum, the Thermomicrobia. Transfer of Sphaerobacter to the class Thermomicrobia, and transfer of the class Thermomicrobia to the phylum Chloroflexi, are proposed. Descriptions for the phylum Chloroflexi and the class Thermomicrobia are emended to reflect the proposed changes in classification.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 115 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 4%
Hong Kong 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 105 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 29 25%
Student > Master 19 17%
Researcher 18 16%
Student > Bachelor 8 7%
Other 7 6%
Other 17 15%
Unknown 17 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 47 41%
Environmental Science 17 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 15 13%
Engineering 5 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 3%
Other 6 5%
Unknown 22 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 October 2022.
All research outputs
#7,452,489
of 22,783,848 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology
#3,198
of 8,755 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,293
of 62,359 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology
#14
of 52 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,783,848 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,755 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 62,359 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 52 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.