| Title |
Fundamental factors affecting biomass enzymatic reactivity
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology, January 2000
|
| DOI | 10.1385/abab:84-86:1-9:5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Vincent S. Chang, Mark T. Holtzapple |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 524 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 3 | <1% |
| Brazil | 2 | <1% |
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| Iran, Islamic Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| Thailand | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 511 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 93 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 92 | 18% |
| Researcher | 76 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 61 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 24 | 5% |
| Other | 63 | 12% |
| Unknown | 115 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 84 | 16% |
| Engineering | 80 | 15% |
| Chemical Engineering | 54 | 10% |
| Chemistry | 45 | 9% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 44 | 8% |
| Other | 64 | 12% |
| Unknown | 153 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 December 2022.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology
#594
of 2,762 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,912
of 109,781 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology
#8
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,762 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 109,781 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.