↓ Skip to main content

Rotavirus Vaccines: Effectiveness, Safety, and Future Directions

Overview of attention for article published in Pediatric Drugs, January 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
93 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
156 Mendeley
Title
Rotavirus Vaccines: Effectiveness, Safety, and Future Directions
Published in
Pediatric Drugs, January 2018
DOI 10.1007/s40272-018-0283-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Eleanor Burnett, Umesh Parashar, Jacqueline Tate

Abstract

Rotavirus is the leading cause of diarrheal death among children < 5 years old worldwide, estimated to have caused ~ 215,000 deaths in 2013. Prior to rotavirus vaccine implementation, > 65% of children had at least one rotavirus diarrhea illness by 5 years of age and rotavirus accounted for > 40% of all-cause diarrhea hospitalizations globally. Two live, oral rotavirus vaccines have been implemented nationally in > 100 countries since 2006 and their use has substantially reduced the burden of severe diarrheal illness in all settings. Vaccine efficacy and effectiveness estimates suggest there is a gradient in vaccine performance between low child-mortality countries (> 90%) and medium and high child-mortality countries (57-75%). Additionally, an increased risk of intussusception (~ 1-6 per 100,000 vaccinated infants) following vaccination has been documented in some countries, but this is outweighed by the large benefits of vaccination. Two additional live, oral rotavirus vaccines were recently licensed and these have improved on some programmatic limitations of earlier vaccines, such as heat stability, cost, and cold-chain footprint. Non-replicating rotavirus vaccines that are parenterally administered are in clinical testing, and these have the potential to reduce the performance differential and safety concerns associated with live oral rotavirus vaccines.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 156 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 156 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 29 19%
Student > Master 23 15%
Researcher 19 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 12%
Student > Postgraduate 7 4%
Other 16 10%
Unknown 44 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 27 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 22 14%
Immunology and Microbiology 16 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 4%
Other 17 11%
Unknown 56 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 October 2023.
All research outputs
#6,209,002
of 24,657,405 outputs
Outputs from Pediatric Drugs
#147
of 578 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#117,715
of 449,844 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pediatric Drugs
#3
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,657,405 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 578 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 449,844 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.