| Title |
Bacterial anatomy in retrospect and prospect
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Antonie van Leeuwenhoek, November 1984
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf02386219 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
N. Nanninga, G. J. Brakenhoff, M. Meijer, C. L. Woldringh |
| Abstract |
Progress in bacterial anatomy over a period of about 15 years is reviewed. In particular, attention is paid to developments in which the Department of Electron Microscopy and Molecular Cytology was involved. Past and present problems in bacterial anatomy as well as approaches to their solution are discussed. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | 8% |
| Germany | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 10 | 83% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 4 | 33% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 17% |
| Other | 1 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 8% |
| Other | 2 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 25% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 25% |
| Engineering | 2 | 17% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 17% |
| Philosophy | 1 | 8% |
| Other | 1 | 8% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 February 2024.
All research outputs
#7,452,489
of 22,783,848 outputs
Outputs from Antonie van Leeuwenhoek
#534
of 2,023 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,647
of 9,852 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Antonie van Leeuwenhoek
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,783,848 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,023 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 9,852 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them