↓ Skip to main content

Implementation of Standardized Clinical Processes for TPMT Testing in a Diverse Multidisciplinary Population: Challenges and Lessons Learned

Overview of attention for article published in CTS: Clinical & Translational Science, January 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
30 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
57 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Implementation of Standardized Clinical Processes for TPMT Testing in a Diverse Multidisciplinary Population: Challenges and Lessons Learned
Published in
CTS: Clinical & Translational Science, January 2018
DOI 10.1111/cts.12533
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kristin W. Weitzel, D. Max Smith, Amanda R. Elsey, Benjamin Q. Duong, Benjamin Burkley, Michael Clare‐Salzler, Yan Gong, Tara A. Higgins, Benjamin Kong, Taimour Langaee, Caitrin W. McDonough, Benjamin J. Staley, Teresa T. Vo, Dyson T. Wake, Larisa H. Cavallari, Julie A. Johnson

Abstract

Although thiopurine S-methyltransferase (TPMT) genotyping to guide thiopurine dosing is common in the pediatric cancer population, limited data exist on TPMT testing implementation in diverse, multidisciplinary settings. We established TPMT testing (genotype and enzyme) with clinical decision support, provider/patient education, and pharmacist consultations in a tertiary medical center and collected data over 3 years. During this time, 834 patients underwent 873 TPMT tests (147 (17%) genotype, 726 (83%) enzyme). TPMT tests were most commonly ordered for gastroenterology, rheumatology, dermatology, and hematology/oncology patients (661 of 834 patients (79.2%); 580 outpatient vs. 293 inpatient; P < 0.0001). Thirty-nine patients had both genotype and enzyme tests (n = 2 discordant results). We observed significant differences between TPMT test use and characteristics in a diverse, multispecialty environment vs. a pediatric cancer setting, which led to unique implementation needs. As pharmacogenetic implementations expand, disseminating lessons learned in diverse, real-world environments will be important to support routine adoption.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 57 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 9 16%
Researcher 6 11%
Student > Bachelor 4 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 5%
Other 3 5%
Other 10 18%
Unknown 22 39%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 13 23%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 16%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 4%
Unspecified 1 2%
Other 4 7%
Unknown 23 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 February 2018.
All research outputs
#6,600,606
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from CTS: Clinical & Translational Science
#270
of 1,015 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#123,208
of 451,056 outputs
Outputs of similar age from CTS: Clinical & Translational Science
#4
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,015 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 451,056 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.