↓ Skip to main content

Withdrawal precipitation by benzodiazepine receptor antagonists in dogs chronically treated with diazepam or the novel anxiolytic and anticonvulsant β-carboline abecarnil

Overview of attention for article published in Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's Archives of Pharmacology, April 1992
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
6 Mendeley
Title
Withdrawal precipitation by benzodiazepine receptor antagonists in dogs chronically treated with diazepam or the novel anxiolytic and anticonvulsant β-carboline abecarnil
Published in
Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's Archives of Pharmacology, April 1992
DOI 10.1007/bf00176624
Pubmed ID
Authors

Wolfgang Löscher, Dagmar Hönack

Abstract

The effects of the benzodiazepine (BZ) receptor antagonists flumazenil (Ro 15-1788) and the beta-carboline ZK 93426 were compared in dogs before and after chronic treatment with diazepam or the novel BZ receptor ligand abecarnil (ZK 112119). Abecarnil, a beta-carboline, is thought to act as partial (low efficacy) and/or subtype selective agonist at central BZ receptors. Diazepam and abecarnil were administered at doses which, based on previous experiments on anticonvulsant activity, resulted in about equieffective drug concentrations during treatment. In dogs treated with diazepam, 6 mg/kg/day p.o., for 2 weeks, severe abstinence symptoms, including seizures, were precipitated in all animals by i.v. infusion of the BZ receptor antagonists, differences being found in the type of symptoms caused by flumazenil and ZK 93426. In dogs treated with abecarnil, 4 mg/kg/d s.c., for 6 weeks, only relatively mild abstinence symptoms were precipitated by infusion of flumazenil or ZK 93426, although pharmacologically active plasma concentrations of abecarnil had been maintained throughout the period of treatment. This suggests that BZ receptor ligands which act as partial and/or selective agonists might be more favourable than traditional agonists, such as diazepam, regarding the induction of physical dependence.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 17%
Unknown 5 83%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 2 33%
Student > Bachelor 1 17%
Other 1 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 17%
Professor 1 17%
Other 0 0%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 3 50%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 17%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 17%
Unknown 1 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 February 2023.
All research outputs
#7,641,993
of 23,269,984 outputs
Outputs from Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's Archives of Pharmacology
#378
of 1,768 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,560
of 19,483 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's Archives of Pharmacology
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,269,984 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,768 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 19,483 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them