Title |
A New Community-Based Model for Training in Evidence-Based Psychotherapy Practice
|
---|---|
Published in |
Community Mental Health Journal, February 2018
|
DOI | 10.1007/s10597-017-0220-x |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Scott Stuart, Jessica Schultz, Ceth Ashen |
Abstract |
It is critical that evidence-based practices (EBP's) be provided to patients. Efforts to train clinicians in the community in EBP's, however, has been hindered by a lack of resources and rigid and resource intensive models of training. We describe efforts to overcome these barriers in a large scale community-based training program for Interpersonal Psychotherapy implemented with over 1400 clinicians in Los Angeles working within the Los Angeles County Department of Mental Health public system of care. The program, described in detail, is a potential template for training for community-based clinicians in evidence-based psychotherapy practices. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 50% |
Slovenia | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 41 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 20% |
Student > Master | 7 | 17% |
Student > Bachelor | 4 | 10% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 7% |
Professor | 2 | 5% |
Other | 8 | 20% |
Unknown | 9 | 22% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Psychology | 16 | 39% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 12% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 10% |
Engineering | 2 | 5% |
Social Sciences | 2 | 5% |
Other | 3 | 7% |
Unknown | 9 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 October 2018.
All research outputs
#15,490,822
of 23,020,670 outputs
Outputs from Community Mental Health Journal
#836
of 1,294 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#269,121
of 439,370 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Community Mental Health Journal
#19
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,020,670 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,294 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 439,370 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.