| Title |
The arterial lesions underlying lacunes
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Acta Neuropathologica, March 1969
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf00685305 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
C. M. Fisher |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 113 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 106 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 21 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 17% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 12 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 8% |
| Other | 21 | 19% |
| Unknown | 21 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 49 | 43% |
| Neuroscience | 19 | 17% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 5% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 9 | 8% |
| Unknown | 25 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 January 2024.
All research outputs
#4,397,112
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Acta Neuropathologica
#1,066
of 2,606 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#195
of 2,645 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Acta Neuropathologica
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,606 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 2,645 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them