↓ Skip to main content

Zur Theorie der Alkoholnarkose

Overview of attention for article published in Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's Archives of Pharmacology, March 1899
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
904 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
69 Mendeley
Title
Zur Theorie der Alkoholnarkose
Published in
Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's Archives of Pharmacology, March 1899
DOI 10.1007/bf01834479
Authors

Hans Meyer

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 69 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Denmark 1 1%
Unknown 68 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 9%
Student > Master 6 9%
Researcher 5 7%
Professor 4 6%
Student > Postgraduate 3 4%
Other 8 12%
Unknown 37 54%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 9 13%
Physics and Astronomy 4 6%
Computer Science 3 4%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Other 8 12%
Unknown 40 58%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 November 2019.
All research outputs
#8,882,501
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's Archives of Pharmacology
#462
of 1,940 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16
of 98 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's Archives of Pharmacology
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,940 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 98 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them