| Title |
Why did the world trade center collapse? Science, engineering, and speculation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JOM, December 2001
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11837-001-0003-1 |
| Authors |
Thomas W. Eagar, Christopher Musso |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 1 | 50% |
| United States | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 73 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Malaysia | 2 | 3% |
| Tanzania, United Republic of | 1 | 1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 1% |
| Ecuador | 1 | 1% |
| Japan | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 67 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 18 | 25% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 11% |
| Researcher | 6 | 8% |
| Other | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 5 | 7% |
| Unknown | 21 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 25 | 34% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 5% |
| Materials Science | 4 | 5% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 11 | 15% |
| Unknown | 22 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 193. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 August 2023.
All research outputs
#208,113
of 25,576,275 outputs
Outputs from JOM
#5
of 1,627 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#177
of 132,613 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JOM
#2
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,576,275 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,627 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 132,613 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.