↓ Skip to main content

Indirect in vivo 5-HT1A-agonistic effects of the new antidepressant mirtazapine

Overview of attention for article published in Psychopharmacology, October 1997
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
38 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
12 Mendeley
Title
Indirect in vivo 5-HT1A-agonistic effects of the new antidepressant mirtazapine
Published in
Psychopharmacology, October 1997
DOI 10.1007/s002130050402
Pubmed ID
Authors

H. H. G. Berendsen, Chris L. E. Broekkamp

Abstract

The new antidepressant mirtazapine was tested in two experimental procedures which can reveal direct or indirect 5-HT1A receptor agonistic effects. These procedures were observation for induction of lower lip retraction in rats and comparison of stimulus properties in cross-familiarization experiments with conditioned taste aversion in mice. Mirtazapine induced lower lip retraction in rats, as did the 5-HT1A receptor agonist (+/-)-8-hydroxy-2-(di-n-propylamino) tetralin (8-OH-DPAT). However, the response to mirtazapine at doses up to 22 mg/kg remained below the maximum score obtained with 8-OH-DPAT (0.46 mg/kg). Blockade of the 5-HT1A receptors with pindolol (10 mg/kg) caused a strong reduction of the lower lip retraction induced both with mirtazapine and 8-OH-DPAT. In the cross-familiarization conditioned taste aversion experiments it was found that the conditioned taste aversion induced by mirtazapine (0.32 mg/kg) could be prevented if the mice were pre-exposed to injections with mirtazapine (0.22 and 0.46 mg/kg), 8-OH-DPAT (0.22 and 0.46 mg/kg) and after pre-exposure to the 5-HT reuptake inhibitor fluoxetine (22 mg/kg). No familiarization for the mirtazapine stimulus was obtained by pre-exposure to (+/-)-1-(2,5-dimethoxy-4-iodophenyl)-2-aminopropane HCl (DOI) (0.46-4.6 mg/kg) and MK212 (2.2-22 mg/kg), being agonists for the 5-HT2A and 5-HT2C receptors, respectively. With the reversed sequence, the conditioned taste aversion induced by 8-OH-DPAT (0.22 mg/kg), DOI (1.0 mg/kg) and fluoxetine could be prevented only partially by pre-exposure to mirtazapine in a dose of 1 mg/kg. The conditioned taste aversion induced by MK 212 (4.6 mg/kg) was not affected by pre-exposure to mirtazapine (0.1-1.0 mg/kg). On the basis of these results, it can be concluded that mirtazapine has indirect 5-HT1A receptor agonistic properties which may play an important role in the therapeutic effect of this compound.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Italy 1 8%
Unknown 11 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 3 25%
Student > Bachelor 3 25%
Researcher 2 17%
Other 1 8%
Unspecified 1 8%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 2 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 3 25%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 17%
Unspecified 1 8%
Psychology 1 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 8%
Other 2 17%
Unknown 2 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 January 2023.
All research outputs
#8,534,528
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Psychopharmacology
#2,227
of 5,320 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,366
of 28,976 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Psychopharmacology
#7
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,320 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.0. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 28,976 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.