↓ Skip to main content

Anatomy of the posterior cruciate ligament and the meniscofemoral ligaments

Overview of attention for article published in Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, October 2005
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
189 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
257 Mendeley
Title
Anatomy of the posterior cruciate ligament and the meniscofemoral ligaments
Published in
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, October 2005
DOI 10.1007/s00167-005-0686-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

A. A. Amis, C. M. Gupte, A. M. J. Bull, A. Edwards

Abstract

This paper describes the anatomy of the posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) and the meniscofemoral ligaments (MFLs). The fibres of the PCL may be split into two functional bundles; the anterolateral bundle (ALB) and the posteromedial bundle (PMB), relating to their femoral attachments. The tibial attachment is relatively compact, with the ALB anterior to the PLB. These bundles are not isometric: the ALB is tightest in the mid-arc of knee flexion, the PMB is tight at both extension and deep flexion. At least one MFL is present in 93% of knees. On the femur, the anterior MFL attaches distal to the PCL, close to the articular cartilage; the posterior MFL attaches proximal to the PCL. They both attach distally to the posterior horn of the lateral meniscus. Their slanting orientation allows the MFLs to resist tibial posterior drawer.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 257 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 249 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 47 18%
Researcher 31 12%
Student > Master 30 12%
Other 23 9%
Student > Bachelor 19 7%
Other 60 23%
Unknown 47 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 127 49%
Engineering 38 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 3%
Sports and Recreations 7 3%
Other 9 4%
Unknown 59 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 July 2023.
All research outputs
#6,653,575
of 23,515,785 outputs
Outputs from Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy
#843
of 2,720 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,503
of 59,175 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy
#4
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,515,785 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,720 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 59,175 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.