↓ Skip to main content

5th International AIDS Society Conference on HIV Pathogenesis, Treatment and Prevention: summary of key research and implications for policy and practice – Biomedical prevention

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of the International AIDS Society, June 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
35 Mendeley
Title
5th International AIDS Society Conference on HIV Pathogenesis, Treatment and Prevention: summary of key research and implications for policy and practice – Biomedical prevention
Published in
Journal of the International AIDS Society, June 2010
DOI 10.1186/1758-2652-13-s1-s4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mark Mascolinli, Rodney Kort

Abstract

No major findings were reported at the 5th IAS Conference on HIV Pathogenesis, Treatment and Prevention (IAS 2009) on currently enrolled microbicides, pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) or vaccine trials, although important findings in all three areas of biomedical prevention research are expected within the next few years.A study found that daily acyclovir did not reduce HIV transmission, but was a factor in modest reductions in viral load, which could confer some clinical benefit. Research demonstrating rapid viral replication in mucosal tissue and subsequent dissemination throughout the body suggested that research priorities should shift towards a mucosal vaccine. Findings reported in Track C indicated that, in addition to reducing vertical transmission, antiretroviral therapy (ART) also lowers the risk of prematurity, stillbirth and abortion.Challenging concerns about the potential "disinhibiting" effect of ART as prevention, a Kenyan study found that widespread ART encourages greater use of condoms and does not increase the rate of risky sex. Another Kenyan study found that pregnancy increases the risk of HIV transmission in a cohort of serodiscordant couples. Although three randomized trials have conclusively demonstrated that circumcision reduces HIV transmission among heterosexual men, research presented at IAS 2009 found no evidence of a preventive impact for women.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
China 1 3%
Unknown 34 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 6 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 9%
Other 2 6%
Student > Bachelor 2 6%
Other 5 14%
Unknown 12 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 31%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 6%
Mathematics 1 3%
Other 4 11%
Unknown 12 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 March 2024.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the International AIDS Society
#1,425
of 2,215 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,225
of 105,104 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the International AIDS Society
#4
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,215 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.4. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 105,104 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.