↓ Skip to main content

Current management of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy

Overview of attention for article published in Current Treatment Options in Cardiovascular Medicine, November 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
82 Mendeley
Title
Current management of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy
Published in
Current Treatment Options in Cardiovascular Medicine, November 2008
DOI 10.1007/s11936-008-0042-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Caroline J. Coats, Perry M. Elliott

Abstract

Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy is a heterogeneous clinical syndrome with a wide spectrum of pathophysiologic consequences. Most cases are inherited and caused by sarcomeric protein gene mutations, although phenocopies are often encountered. Genomic research and family studies have improved our recognition of the disease and understanding of its natural history; however, tenuous links exist between genotype and phenotype and thus far have done little to alter clinical management. Surgery and, more recently, implantable cardiac defibrillators have had an impact on sudden cardiac death rates, with improved short- and medium-term survival. Therefore, managing heart failure has become increasingly challenging. Although heart failure due to fibrosis and a progressive loss of contractile function is common, treatment remains largely empiric. Case series and animal studies suggest that biventricular pacing and renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system modifiers may be useful in some patients, but there is a need for large prospective randomized controlled trials to study these and other treatments. Risk stratification and eligibility for sports participation remain hot topics, but one of the greatest challenges is the management of a growing cohort of asymptomatic gene carriers identified during family screening. Ultimately, major advances in treatment and disease prevention will come from a better understanding of the genomic, proteomic, and metabolomic profiles of individual patients.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 82 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 79 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 13 16%
Student > Master 12 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 12%
Researcher 8 10%
Other 6 7%
Other 13 16%
Unknown 20 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 34 41%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 7%
Engineering 4 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 4%
Sports and Recreations 3 4%
Other 10 12%
Unknown 22 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 May 2021.
All research outputs
#4,695,422
of 22,783,848 outputs
Outputs from Current Treatment Options in Cardiovascular Medicine
#94
of 410 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,720
of 166,406 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Treatment Options in Cardiovascular Medicine
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,783,848 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 410 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 166,406 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them