↓ Skip to main content

Nutrition knowledge, diet quality and hypertension in a working population

Overview of attention for article published in Preventive Medicine Reports, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
15 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
30 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
295 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Nutrition knowledge, diet quality and hypertension in a working population
Published in
Preventive Medicine Reports, January 2015
DOI 10.1016/j.pmedr.2014.11.008
Pubmed ID
Authors

F. Geaney, S. Fitzgerald, J.M. Harrington, C. Kelly, B.A. Greiner, I.J. Perry

Abstract

To examine if employees with higher nutrition knowledge have better diet quality and lower prevalence of hypertension. Cross-sectional baseline data were obtained from the complex workplace dietary intervention trial, the Food Choice at Work Study. Participants included 828 randomly selected employees (18-64 years) recruited from four multinational manufacturing workplaces in Ireland, 2013. A validated questionnaire assessed nutrition knowledge. Food Frequency Questionnaires (FFQ) measured diet quality from which a DASH (Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension) score was constructed. Standardised digital blood pressure monitors measured hypertension. Nutrition knowledge was positively associated with diet quality after adjustment for age, gender, health status, lifestyle and socio-demographic characteristics. The odds of having a high DASH score (better diet quality) were 6 times higher in the highest nutrition knowledge group compared to the lowest group (OR = 5.8, 95% CI 3.5 to 9.6). Employees in the highest nutrition knowledge group were 60% less likely to be hypertensive compared to the lowest group (OR = 0.4, 95% CI 0.2 to 0.87). However, multivariate analyses were not consistent with a mediation effect of the DASH score on the association between nutrition knowledge and blood pressure. Higher nutrition knowledge is associated with better diet quality and lower blood pressure but the inter-relationships between these variables are complex.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 295 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Malaysia 2 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Unknown 290 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 71 24%
Student > Master 50 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 8%
Researcher 13 4%
Lecturer 11 4%
Other 33 11%
Unknown 92 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 72 24%
Medicine and Dentistry 39 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 21 7%
Social Sciences 18 6%
Psychology 6 2%
Other 33 11%
Unknown 106 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 January 2020.
All research outputs
#2,388,620
of 25,559,053 outputs
Outputs from Preventive Medicine Reports
#301
of 1,723 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,522
of 362,427 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Preventive Medicine Reports
#7
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,559,053 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,723 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 362,427 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.