↓ Skip to main content

Intranasal insulin in Alzheimer’s dementia or mild cognitive impairment: a systematic review

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Neurology, February 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
14 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
105 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
169 Mendeley
Title
Intranasal insulin in Alzheimer’s dementia or mild cognitive impairment: a systematic review
Published in
Journal of Neurology, February 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00415-018-8768-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Konstantinos Ioannis Avgerinos, Grigorios Kalaitzidis, Antonia Malli, Dimitrios Kalaitzoglou, Pavlos Gr. Myserlis, Vasileios-Arsenios Lioutas

Abstract

Due to common pathophysiological findings of Alzheimer's disease (AD) with diabetes mellitus (DM), insulin has been suggested as a possible treatment of AD or mild cognitive impairment (MCI). A safe alternative of IV insulin is intranasal (IN) insulin. The aim of this systematic review is to investigate the effects of IN insulin on cognitive function of patients with either AD or MCI. A literature search of the electronic databases Medline, Scopus and CENTRAL was performed to identify RCTs investigating the effect of IN insulin administration on cognitive tasks, in patients with AD or MCI. Seven studies (293 patients) met our inclusion criteria. Most studies showed that verbal memory and especially story recall was improved after IN insulin administration. Sometimes the effect was restricted for apoe4 (-) patients. Intranasal insulin did not affect other cognitive functions. However, there were some positive results in functional status and daily activity. Data suggested that different insulin types and doses may have different effects on different apoe4 groups. In addition, the effects of treatment on Αβ levels differed from study to study. Finally, IN insulin resulted in minor adverse effects. Intranasal insulin improved story recall performance of apoe4 (-) patients with AD or MCI. Other cognitive functions were not affected, but there were some positive results in functional status and daily activity. Since IN insulin is a safe intervention, future studies should be conducted with larger doses and after proper selection of patients and insulin types.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 169 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 169 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 29 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 11%
Student > Master 19 11%
Researcher 15 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 7%
Other 17 10%
Unknown 59 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 30 18%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 16 9%
Neuroscience 14 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 5%
Other 27 16%
Unknown 62 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 April 2021.
All research outputs
#1,943,195
of 23,567,572 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Neurology
#297
of 4,610 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47,666
of 442,605 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Neurology
#8
of 89 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,567,572 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,610 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 442,605 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 89 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.