↓ Skip to main content

Economic Impacts of Zebra Mussels on Drinking Water Treatment and Electric Power Generation Facilities

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Management, May 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
policy
1 policy source
patent
7 patents
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
152 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
227 Mendeley
Title
Economic Impacts of Zebra Mussels on Drinking Water Treatment and Electric Power Generation Facilities
Published in
Environmental Management, May 2007
DOI 10.1007/s00267-006-0296-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nancy A. Connelly, Charles R. O’Neill, Barbara A. Knuth, Tommy L. Brown

Abstract

Invasions of nonnative species such as zebra mussels can have both ecological and economic consequences. The economic impacts of zebra mussels have not been examined in detail since the mid-1990s. The purpose of this study was to quantify the annual and cumulative economic impact of zebra mussels on surface water-dependent drinking water treatment and electric power generation facilities (where previous research indicated the greatest impacts). The study time frame was from the first full year after discovery in North America (Lake St. Clair, 1989) to the present (2004); the study area was throughout the mussels' North American range. A mail survey resulted in a response rate of 31% for electric power companies and 41% for drinking water treatment plants. Telephone interviews with a sample of nonrespondents assessed nonresponse bias; only one difference was found and adjusted for. Over one-third (37%) of surveyed facilities reported finding zebra mussels in the facility and almost half (45%) have initiated preventive measures to prevent zebra mussels from entering the facility operations. Almost all surveyed facilities (91%) with zebra mussels have used control or mitigation alternatives to remove or control zebra mussels. We estimated that 36% of surveyed facilities experienced an economic impact. Expanding the sample to the population of the study area, we estimated 267 million dollars (BCa 95% CI = 161 million dollars - 467 million dollars) in total economic costs for electric generation and water treatment facilities through late 2004, since 1989. Annual costs were greater (44,000 dollars/facility) during the early years of zebra mussel infestation than in recent years (30,000 dollars). As a result of this and other factors, early predictions of the ultimate costs of the zebra mussel invasion may have been excessive.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 227 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 2 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 220 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 57 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 37 16%
Researcher 32 14%
Student > Master 32 14%
Other 11 5%
Other 21 9%
Unknown 37 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 71 31%
Environmental Science 57 25%
Engineering 14 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 5%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 5 2%
Other 22 10%
Unknown 47 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 July 2022.
All research outputs
#1,892,273
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Management
#113
of 1,914 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,898
of 83,096 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Management
#3
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,914 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 83,096 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.