↓ Skip to main content

Synthesis of biocompatible surfaces by nanotechnology methods

Overview of attention for article published in Nanobiotechnology Reports, November 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
43 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
50 Mendeley
Title
Synthesis of biocompatible surfaces by nanotechnology methods
Published in
Nanobiotechnology Reports, November 2010
DOI 10.1134/s1995078010090144
Authors

A. P. Alekhin, G. M. Boleiko, S. A. Gudkova, A. M. Markeev, A. A. Sigarev, V. F. Toknova, A. G. Kirilenko, R. V. Lapshin, E. N. Kozlov, D. V. Tetyukhin

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 50 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 20%
Student > Master 8 16%
Student > Bachelor 8 16%
Researcher 7 14%
Student > Postgraduate 2 4%
Other 5 10%
Unknown 10 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Materials Science 10 20%
Chemistry 7 14%
Engineering 6 12%
Physics and Astronomy 4 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 4%
Other 6 12%
Unknown 15 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 February 2011.
All research outputs
#8,543,833
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from Nanobiotechnology Reports
#15
of 38 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,298
of 109,991 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nanobiotechnology Reports
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 38 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one scored the same or higher as 23 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 109,991 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them