↓ Skip to main content

Female dominance in blue-eyed black lemurs (Eulemur macaco flavifrons)

Overview of attention for article published in Primates, July 2002
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
6 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
52 Mendeley
Title
Female dominance in blue-eyed black lemurs (Eulemur macaco flavifrons)
Published in
Primates, July 2002
DOI 10.1007/bf02629647
Pubmed ID
Authors

Leslie J. Digby, Sonya M. Kahlenberg

Abstract

Female dominance is unusual among mammals and has been described in detail for only a handful of species. Here we present data on the frequency and outcome of dominance interactions in seven semi-free ranging and captive groups of blue-eyed black lemurs (Eulemur macaco flavifrons) housed at the Duke University Primate Center. We collected over 260 hours of focal data during which all occurrences of dominant-subordinate interactions were recorded. We collected data outside the typical breeding and birthing seasons for this species, thus eliminating possible confounding factors and increased aggression associated with these periods. We found that females were dominant over males in all seven groups, with females winning 99% of all dominance interactions. E. m. flavifrons used aggressive dominance (e.g. chase, cuff, bite) in 81% of all interactions, with the remainder of interactions being decided using social dominance (e.g. deference in the form of supplants or cowers). Older females were dominant over younger females in two out of three multi-female groups (in each case, younger females were daughters), and younger males (sons of the dominant female) received less aggression from females than did older males (n = 2 groups). Caging and group size appear to play a minimal role in the expression of female dominance. While confirmation must await further observations on free-ranging groups of E. m. flavifrons, our data strongly suggest that this subspecies can be characterized as female dominant.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Unknown 51 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 13 25%
Student > Bachelor 12 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 19%
Researcher 7 13%
Professor 2 4%
Other 4 8%
Unknown 4 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 28 54%
Environmental Science 6 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 10%
Psychology 3 6%
Social Sciences 2 4%
Other 3 6%
Unknown 5 10%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 April 2014.
All research outputs
#7,452,489
of 22,783,848 outputs
Outputs from Primates
#470
of 1,014 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,162
of 44,608 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Primates
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,783,848 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,014 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.3. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 44,608 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them