| Title |
Feeding ecology of the proboscis monkey (Nasalis larvatus)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal of Primatology, December 1989
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf02739363 |
| Authors |
Carey P. Yeager |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 119 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 4 | 3% |
| United States | 3 | 3% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 109 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 26 | 22% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 15 | 13% |
| Researcher | 14 | 12% |
| Other | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 15 | 13% |
| Unknown | 24 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 50 | 42% |
| Environmental Science | 21 | 18% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 4 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 8 | 7% |
| Unknown | 29 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 December 2022.
All research outputs
#2,758,547
of 23,269,984 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Primatology
#191
of 1,123 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,806
of 58,803 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Primatology
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,269,984 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,123 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 58,803 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them