↓ Skip to main content

CONGRUENCE AND CONTROVERSY: Toward a Higher-Level Phylogeny of Diptera

Overview of attention for article published in Annual Review of Entomology, January 1999
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
15 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
215 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
235 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
CONGRUENCE AND CONTROVERSY: Toward a Higher-Level Phylogeny of Diptera
Published in
Annual Review of Entomology, January 1999
DOI 10.1146/annurev.ento.44.1.397
Pubmed ID
Authors

D. K. Yeates, B. M. Wiegmann

Abstract

The order Diptera (true flies) is one of the most species-rich and ecologically diverse clades of insects. The order probably arose in the Permian, and the main lineages of flies were present in the Triassic. A novel recent proposal suggests that Strepsiptera are the sister-order to Diptera. Within Diptera, evidence is convincing for the monophyly of Culicomorpha, Blephariceromorpha, and Tipulomorpha but weak for the monophyly of the other basal infraorders and for the relationships among them. The lower Diptera (Nematocera) is paraphyletic with respect to Brachycera, and morphological evidence suggests the sister-group of Brachycera lies in the Psychodomorpha. Recent analyses suggest Tipulomorpha are closer to the base of Brachycera than to the base of Diptera. Brachycera are undoubtedly monophyletic, but relationships between the basal lineages of this group are poorly understood. The monophyly of Stratiomyomorpha, Xylophagomorpha, Tabanomorpha, and Muscomorpha is well supported. Eremoneura, and its constituent clades Empidoidea and Cyclorrhapha, are monophyletic. The sister-group of Eremoneura is likely to be part or all of Asiloidea. Several viewpoints on the homology of the male genitalia of eremoneuran flies are discussed. Phylogenetic analyses suggest that lower Cyclorrhapha (Aschiza) are paraphyletic; however, schizophoran monophyly is well supported. The monophyly of Acalyptratae is not well-founded and the relationships between acalyptrate superfamilies remain obscure. Recent advances document the monophyly of the families of Calyptratae and the relationships among them. Areas critical to future advances in understanding dipteran phylogeny include the relationships among the basal infraorders of Diptera and Brachycera and the relationships between the superfamilies of acalyptrates. Progress in dipteran phylogenetics will accelerate with the exploration of novel data sources and the formulation of hypotheses in an explicitly quantitative framework.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 235 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 6 3%
United States 3 1%
Germany 2 <1%
South Africa 2 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Egypt 1 <1%
Unknown 218 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 43 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 40 17%
Student > Master 31 13%
Student > Bachelor 26 11%
Professor 21 9%
Other 44 19%
Unknown 30 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 164 70%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 16 7%
Environmental Science 9 4%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 2%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 3 1%
Other 11 5%
Unknown 28 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 July 2023.
All research outputs
#7,576,061
of 23,103,436 outputs
Outputs from Annual Review of Entomology
#565
of 985 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,004
of 99,828 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annual Review of Entomology
#10
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,103,436 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 985 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.4. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 99,828 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.