↓ Skip to main content

Polestar refined: Business ethics and political economy

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Business Ethics, December 1991
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
5 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
Title
Polestar refined: Business ethics and political economy
Published in
Journal of Business Ethics, December 1991
DOI 10.1007/bf00383797
Authors

John R. Danley

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
South Africa 1 6%
Unknown 16 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 3 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 18%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 12%
Student > Postgraduate 2 12%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 12%
Other 3 18%
Unknown 2 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Business, Management and Accounting 7 41%
Philosophy 3 18%
Social Sciences 3 18%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 6%
Computer Science 1 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 2 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 September 2010.
All research outputs
#7,452,489
of 22,783,848 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Business Ethics
#1,181
of 2,935 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,467
of 61,723 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Business Ethics
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,783,848 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,935 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.0. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 61,723 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.