↓ Skip to main content

Sub-irrigation in wetland agriculture

Overview of attention for article published in Agriculture and Human Values, June 2004
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
68 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Sub-irrigation in wetland agriculture
Published in
Agriculture and Human Values, June 2004
DOI 10.1023/b:ahum.0000029395.84972.5e
Authors

Phil L. Crossley

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 68 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Mexico 2 3%
United States 2 3%
Switzerland 1 1%
Unknown 63 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 14 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 13%
Student > Bachelor 9 13%
Researcher 7 10%
Professor 6 9%
Other 14 21%
Unknown 9 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 24 35%
Environmental Science 14 21%
Engineering 5 7%
Social Sciences 4 6%
Arts and Humanities 2 3%
Other 7 10%
Unknown 12 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 November 2016.
All research outputs
#8,534,528
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Agriculture and Human Values
#473
of 856 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,858
of 62,302 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Agriculture and Human Values
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 856 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.1. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 62,302 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.