↓ Skip to main content

Review on the distribution and biology of Antarctic Monoplacophora, with first abyssal record of Laevipilina antarctica

Overview of attention for article published in Polar Biology, May 2006
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
9 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
32 Mendeley
Title
Review on the distribution and biology of Antarctic Monoplacophora, with first abyssal record of Laevipilina antarctica
Published in
Polar Biology, May 2006
DOI 10.1007/s00300-006-0132-7
Authors

Michael Schrödl, Katrin Linse, Enrico Schwabe

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 3%
Mexico 1 3%
Unknown 30 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 28%
Professor 5 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 13%
Other 3 9%
Student > Bachelor 3 9%
Other 6 19%
Unknown 2 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 24 75%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 4 13%
Environmental Science 2 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Unknown 1 3%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 March 2022.
All research outputs
#7,663,778
of 23,330,477 outputs
Outputs from Polar Biology
#604
of 1,660 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,253
of 66,401 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Polar Biology
#5
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,330,477 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,660 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.6. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 66,401 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.