↓ Skip to main content

The Personal Genome Project Canada: findings from whole genome sequences of the inaugural 56 participants

Overview of attention for article published in Canadian Medical Association Journal, February 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
9 news outlets
blogs
5 blogs
twitter
96 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
2 Google+ users

Citations

dimensions_citation
56 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
134 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Personal Genome Project Canada: findings from whole genome sequences of the inaugural 56 participants
Published in
Canadian Medical Association Journal, February 2018
DOI 10.1503/cmaj.171151
Pubmed ID
Authors

Miriam S Reuter, Susan Walker, Bhooma Thiruvahindrapuram, Joe Whitney, Iris Cohn, Neal Sondheimer, Ryan K C Yuen, Brett Trost, Tara A Paton, Sergio L Pereira, Jo-Anne Herbrick, Richard F Wintle, Daniele Merico, Jennifer Howe, Jeffrey R MacDonald, Chao Lu, Thomas Nalpathamkalam, Wilson W L Sung, Zhuozhi Wang, Rohan V Patel, Giovanna Pellecchia, John Wei, Lisa J Strug, Sherilyn Bell, Barbara Kellam, Melanie M Mahtani, Anne S Bassett, Yvonne Bombard, Rosanna Weksberg, Cheryl Shuman, Ronald D Cohn, Dimitri J Stavropoulos, Sarah Bowdin, Matthew R Hildebrandt, Wei Wei, Asli Romm, Peter Pasceri, James Ellis, Peter Ray, M Stephen Meyn, Nasim Monfared, S Mohsen Hosseini, Ann M Joseph-George, Fred W Keeley, Ryan A Cook, Marc Fiume, Hin C Lee, Christian R Marshall, Jill Davies, Allison Hazell, Janet A Buchanan, Michael J Szego, Stephen W Scherer

Abstract

The Personal Genome Project Canada is a comprehensive public data resource that integrates whole genome sequencing data and health information. We describe genomic variation identified in the initial recruitment cohort of 56 volunteers. Volunteers were screened for eligibility and provided informed consent for open data sharing. Using blood DNA, we performed whole genome sequencing and identified all possible classes of DNA variants. A genetic counsellor explained the implication of the results to each participant. Whole genome sequencing of the first 56 participants identified 207 662 805 sequence variants and 27 494 copy number variations. We analyzed a prioritized disease-associated data set (n = 1606 variants) according to standardized guidelines, and interpreted 19 variants in 14 participants (25%) as having obvious health implications. Six of these variants (e.g., in BRCA1 or mosaic loss of an X chromosome) were pathogenic or likely pathogenic. Seven were risk factors for cancer, cardiovascular or neurobehavioural conditions. Four other variants - associated with cancer, cardiac or neurodegenerative phenotypes - remained of uncertain significance because of discrepancies among databases. We also identified a large structural chromosome aberration and a likely pathogenic mitochondrial variant. There were 172 recessive disease alleles (e.g., 5 individuals carried mutations for cystic fibrosis). Pharmacogenomics analyses revealed another 3.9 potentially relevant genotypes per individual. Our analyses identified a spectrum of genetic variants with potential health impact in 25% of participants. When also considering recessive alleles and variants with potential pharmacologic relevance, all 56 participants had medically relevant findings. Although access is mostly limited to research, whole genome sequencing can provide specific and novel information with the potential of major impact for health care.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 96 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 134 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 134 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 24 18%
Student > Bachelor 23 17%
Other 14 10%
Student > Master 11 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 7%
Other 19 14%
Unknown 33 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 36 27%
Medicine and Dentistry 19 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 4%
Computer Science 4 3%
Other 24 18%
Unknown 38 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 167. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 December 2023.
All research outputs
#245,633
of 25,576,801 outputs
Outputs from Canadian Medical Association Journal
#442
of 9,504 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,695
of 449,434 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Canadian Medical Association Journal
#9
of 108 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,576,801 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,504 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 449,434 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 108 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.