↓ Skip to main content

Craniosynostosis as a clinical and diagnostic problem: molecular pathology and genetic counseling

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Applied Genetics, February 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
48 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
87 Mendeley
Title
Craniosynostosis as a clinical and diagnostic problem: molecular pathology and genetic counseling
Published in
Journal of Applied Genetics, February 2018
DOI 10.1007/s13353-017-0423-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anna Kutkowska-Kaźmierczak, Monika Gos, Ewa Obersztyn

Abstract

Craniosynostosis (occurrence: 1/2500 live births) is a result of premature fusion of cranial sutures, leading to alterations of the pattern of cranial growth, resulting in abnormal shape of the head and dysmorphic facial features. In approximately 85% of cases, the disease is isolated and nonsyndromic and mainly involves only one suture. Syndromic craniosynostoses such as Crouzon, Apert, Pfeiffer, Muenke, and Saethre-Chotzen syndromes not only affect multiple sutures, but are also associated with the presence of additional clinical symptoms, including hand and feet malformations, skeletal and cardiac defects, developmental delay, and others. The etiology of craniosynostoses may involve genetic (also somatic mosaicism and regulatory mutations) and epigenetic factors, as well as environmental factors. According to the published data, chromosomal aberrations, mostly submicroscopic ones, account for about 6.7-40% of cases of syndromic craniosynostoses presenting with premature fusion of metopic or sagittal sutures. The best characterized is the deletion or translocation of the 7p21 region containing the TWIST1 gene. The deletions of 9p22 or 11q23-qter (Jacobsen syndrome) are both associated with trigonocephaly. The genes related to the pathogenesis of the craniosynostoses itself are those encoding transcription factors, e.g., TWIST1, MSX2, EN1, and ZIC1, and proteins involved in osteogenic proliferation, differentiation, and homeostasis, such as FGFR1, FGFR2, RUNX2, POR, and many others. In this review, we present the clinical and molecular features of selected craniosynostosis syndromes, genotype-phenotype correlation, family genetic counseling, and propose the most appropriate diagnostic algorithm.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 87 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 87 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 12 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 10%
Student > Postgraduate 7 8%
Researcher 7 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 7%
Other 13 15%
Unknown 33 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 36 41%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 8%
Unspecified 2 2%
Psychology 2 2%
Neuroscience 2 2%
Other 4 5%
Unknown 34 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 April 2018.
All research outputs
#17,929,042
of 23,020,670 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Applied Genetics
#222
of 395 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#309,571
of 440,103 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Applied Genetics
#6
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,020,670 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 395 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 440,103 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.