↓ Skip to main content

Conceptualization of above and below relationships by an insect

Overview of attention for article published in Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, November 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
84 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
128 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Conceptualization of above and below relationships by an insect
Published in
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, November 2010
DOI 10.1098/rspb.2010.1891
Pubmed ID
Authors

Aurore Avarguès-Weber, Adrian G. Dyer, Martin Giurfa

Abstract

Relational rules such as 'same' or 'different' are mastered by humans and non-human primates and are considered as abstract conceptual thinking as they require relational learning beyond perceptual generalization. Here, we investigated whether an insect, the honeybee (Apis mellifera), can form a conceptual representation of an above/below spatial relationship. In experiment 1, bees were trained with differential conditioning to choose a variable target located above or below a black bar that acted as constant referent throughout the experiment. In experiment 2, two visual stimuli were aligned vertically, one being the referent, which was kept constant throughout the experiment, and the other the target, which was variable. In both experiments, the distance between the target and the referent, and their location within the visual field was systematically varied. In both cases, bees succeeded in transferring the learned concept to novel stimuli, preserving the trained spatial relation, thus showing an ability to manipulate this relational concept independently of the physical nature of the stimuli. Absolute location of the referent into the visual field was not a low-level cue used by the bees to solve the task. The honeybee is thus capable of conceptual learning despite having a miniature brain, showing that such elaborated learning form is not a prerogative of vertebrates.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 128 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 2%
Spain 2 2%
France 1 <1%
Israel 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 117 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 32 25%
Researcher 26 20%
Student > Master 17 13%
Student > Bachelor 8 6%
Professor 6 5%
Other 20 16%
Unknown 19 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 62 48%
Psychology 14 11%
Environmental Science 6 5%
Neuroscience 6 5%
Computer Science 4 3%
Other 13 10%
Unknown 23 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 November 2021.
All research outputs
#4,331,774
of 25,461,852 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
#6,095
of 11,357 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,287
of 111,029 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
#78
of 127 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,461,852 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,357 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.4. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 111,029 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 127 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.