↓ Skip to main content

Arabidopsis glutamate:glyoxylate aminotransferase 1 (Ler) mutants generated by CRISPR/Cas9 and their characteristics

Overview of attention for article published in Transgenic Research, February 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
21 Mendeley
Title
Arabidopsis glutamate:glyoxylate aminotransferase 1 (Ler) mutants generated by CRISPR/Cas9 and their characteristics
Published in
Transgenic Research, February 2018
DOI 10.1007/s11248-017-0052-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yaping Liang, Xiuying Zeng, Xinxiang Peng, Xuewen Hou

Abstract

Clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR)/CRISPR-associated 9 (CRISPR/Cas9) technology provides an efficient tool for editing the genomes of plants, animals and microorganisms. Glutamate:glyoxylate aminotransferase 1 (GGAT1) is a key enzyme in the photorespiration pathway; however, its regulation mechanism is largely unknown. Given that EMS-mutagenized ggat1 (Col-0 background) M2 pools have been generated, ggat1 (Ler background) should be very useful in the positional cloning of suppressor and/or enhancer genes of GGAT1. Unfortunately, such ggat1 (Ler) mutants are not currently available. In this study, CRISPR/Cas9 was used to generate ggat1 (Ler) mutants. Two GGAT1 target single-guide RNAs (sgRNAs) were constructed into pYLCRISPR/Cas9P35S-N, and flowering Arabidopsis (Ler) plants were transformed using an Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated floral dip protocol. Eleven chimeric and two heterozygous GGAT1-edited T1 lines of target 1 were separately screened from positive transgenic lines. Two ggat1 homozygous mutants, CTC-deletion and T-deletion at target 1, were generated from T2 generations of the 13 T1 lines. The edited mutation sites were found to be stable through generations regardless of whether the T-DNA was present. In addition, the genetic segregation of the mutation sites obeyed the Mendelian single gene segregation rule, and no mutations were detected at the possible off-target site. Also, the two independent ggat1 mutants had similar photorespiration phenotypes and down-regulated GGAT enzyme activity. Together, these results indicate that genetically stable ggat1 (Ler) mutants were generated by CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing, and these mutants will be used to promote the positional cloning of suppressor and/or enhancer genes of GGAT1 in our subsequent study.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 21 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 24%
Student > Bachelor 3 14%
Student > Master 3 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 5%
Professor 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 7 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 48%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 19%
Engineering 1 5%
Unknown 6 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 February 2018.
All research outputs
#18,585,544
of 23,020,670 outputs
Outputs from Transgenic Research
#781
of 895 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#329,664
of 440,103 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Transgenic Research
#11
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,020,670 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 895 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 440,103 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.