↓ Skip to main content

Physiological and molecular determinants of embryo implantation

Overview of attention for article published in Molecular Aspects of Medicine, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#42 of 645)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
patent
2 patents
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
409 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
489 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Physiological and molecular determinants of embryo implantation
Published in
Molecular Aspects of Medicine, January 2013
DOI 10.1016/j.mam.2012.12.011
Pubmed ID
Authors

Shuang Zhang, Haiyan Lin, Shuangbo Kong, Shumin Wang, Hongmei Wang, Haibin Wang, D. Randall Armant

Abstract

Embryo implantation involves the intimate interaction between an implantation-competent blastocyst and a receptive uterus, which occurs in a limited time period known as the window of implantation. Emerging evidence shows that defects originating during embryo implantation induce ripple effects with adverse consequences on later gestation events, highlighting the significance of this event for pregnancy success. Although a multitude of cellular events and molecular pathways involved in embryo-uterine crosstalk during implantation have been identified through gene expression studies and genetically engineered mouse models, a comprehensive understanding of the nature of embryo implantation is still missing. This review focuses on recent progress with particular attention to physiological and molecular determinants of blastocyst activation, uterine receptivity, blastocyst attachment and uterine decidualization. A better understanding of underlying mechanisms governing embryo implantation should generate new strategies to rectify implantation failure and improve pregnancy rates in women.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 489 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 4 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Ukraine 1 <1%
Peru 1 <1%
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Poland 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 477 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 81 17%
Student > Master 71 15%
Student > Bachelor 60 12%
Researcher 51 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 34 7%
Other 65 13%
Unknown 127 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 98 20%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 84 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 81 17%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 12 2%
Immunology and Microbiology 11 2%
Other 60 12%
Unknown 143 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 27. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 January 2024.
All research outputs
#1,405,163
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Molecular Aspects of Medicine
#42
of 645 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,060
of 288,946 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Molecular Aspects of Medicine
#2
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 645 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 288,946 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 7 of them.