↓ Skip to main content

Efferent connections of the cingulate gyrus in the rhesus monkey

Overview of attention for article published in Experimental Brain Research, May 1981
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
509 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
195 Mendeley
Title
Efferent connections of the cingulate gyrus in the rhesus monkey
Published in
Experimental Brain Research, May 1981
DOI 10.1007/bf00237497
Pubmed ID
Authors

D. N. Pandya, G. W. Van Hoesen, M. -M. Mesulam

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 195 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 2%
Canada 2 1%
United Kingdom 2 1%
France 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 183 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 46 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 40 21%
Professor > Associate Professor 17 9%
Student > Bachelor 15 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 6%
Other 39 20%
Unknown 27 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 42 22%
Psychology 34 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 33 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 26 13%
Computer Science 3 2%
Other 18 9%
Unknown 39 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 December 2019.
All research outputs
#7,452,489
of 22,783,848 outputs
Outputs from Experimental Brain Research
#900
of 3,224 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,732
of 6,996 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Experimental Brain Research
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,783,848 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,224 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 6,996 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them