| Title |
The subsurface radial gradient of solar angular velocity from MDI f-mode observations
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Solar Physics, February 2002
|
| DOI | 10.1023/a:1014224523374 |
| Authors |
T. Corbard, M.J. Thompson |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 7 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 43% |
| Researcher | 2 | 29% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 1 | 14% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 1 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Physics and Astronomy | 7 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 May 2017.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Solar Physics
#777
of 1,763 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,342
of 132,991 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Solar Physics
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,763 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 132,991 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them