↓ Skip to main content

Intention to Become Pregnant and Low Birth Weight and Preterm Birth: A Systematic Review

Overview of attention for article published in Maternal and Child Health Journal, December 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
wikipedia
5 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
267 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
289 Mendeley
Title
Intention to Become Pregnant and Low Birth Weight and Preterm Birth: A Systematic Review
Published in
Maternal and Child Health Journal, December 2009
DOI 10.1007/s10995-009-0546-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Prakesh S. Shah, Taiba Balkhair, Arne Ohlsson, Joseph Beyene, Fran Scott, Corine Frick

Abstract

Increased stress, psychosocial problems, economic disadvantages, and lack of prenatal care are proposed to explain discrepancies in the outcome of unintended pregnancies. Studies of maternal intention and pregnancy outcomes have yielded varied results. Objective is to review studies of the risk of low birth weight (LBW)/preterm births (PTB) associated with unintended pregnancies ending in a live birth. We reviewed studies reporting on maternal intentions and outcomes from Medline, Embase, CINAHL, and bibliographies of identified articles. An unintended pregnancy was further classified as mistimed (not intended at that time) or unwanted (not desired at any time). Studies reporting an association between pregnancy intention and any of the outcomes were included. Study quality was assessed for biases in selection, exposure assessment, confounder adjustment, analyses, outcomes assessment, and attrition. Unadjusted and adjusted data from included studies were extracted by two reviewers. There were significantly increased odds of LBW among unintended pregnancies [odds ratio (OR) 1.36, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.25, 1.48] ending in a live birth. Within the unintended category, mistimed (OR 1.31, 95% CI 1.13, 1.52) and unwanted (OR 1.51, 95% CI 1.29, 1.78) pregnancies were associated with LBW. There were statistically significantly increased odds of PTB among unintended (OR 1.31, 95% CI 1.09, 1.58), and unwanted (OR 1.50, 95% CI 1.41, 1.61) but not for mistimed (OR 1.36, 95% CI 0.96, 1.93) pregnancies. Unintended, unwanted, and mistimed pregnancies ending in a live birth are associated with a significantly increased risk of LBW and PTB.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 289 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Colombia 2 <1%
Ethiopia 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Romania 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 282 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 49 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 35 12%
Researcher 22 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 21 7%
Student > Postgraduate 20 7%
Other 58 20%
Unknown 84 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 85 29%
Nursing and Health Professions 34 12%
Social Sciences 27 9%
Psychology 21 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 2%
Other 22 8%
Unknown 94 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 36. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 July 2022.
All research outputs
#1,065,491
of 24,397,600 outputs
Outputs from Maternal and Child Health Journal
#86
of 2,081 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,106
of 173,193 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Maternal and Child Health Journal
#3
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,397,600 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,081 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 173,193 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.