↓ Skip to main content

Which electrospray-based ionization method best reflects protein-ligand interactions found in solution? A comparison of ESI, nanoESI, and ESSI for the determination of dissociation constants with…

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry, November 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
97 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
84 Mendeley
Title
Which electrospray-based ionization method best reflects protein-ligand interactions found in solution? A comparison of ESI, nanoESI, and ESSI for the determination of dissociation constants with mass spectrometry
Published in
Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry, November 2011
DOI 10.1016/j.jasms.2007.11.007
Pubmed ID
Authors

Matthias Conradin Jecklin, David Touboul, Cédric Bovet, Arno Wortmann, Renato Zenobi

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 84 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 2%
United States 1 1%
Belgium 1 1%
Switzerland 1 1%
Unknown 79 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 32%
Researcher 19 23%
Student > Bachelor 7 8%
Student > Master 6 7%
Student > Postgraduate 3 4%
Other 8 10%
Unknown 14 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 37 44%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 18%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 4%
Physics and Astronomy 2 2%
Other 2 2%
Unknown 18 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 March 2021.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry
#1,226
of 3,833 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#71,830
of 245,487 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry
#65
of 172 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,833 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 245,487 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 172 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.