↓ Skip to main content

Mutual information functions versus correlation functions

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Statistical Physics, September 1990
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
349 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
256 Mendeley
citeulike
5 CiteULike
Title
Mutual information functions versus correlation functions
Published in
Journal of Statistical Physics, September 1990
DOI 10.1007/bf01025996
Authors

Wentian Li

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 256 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 12 5%
Germany 5 2%
United Kingdom 4 2%
France 3 1%
Brazil 3 1%
Spain 2 <1%
Japan 2 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Other 7 3%
Unknown 216 84%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 67 26%
Researcher 65 25%
Student > Master 27 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 6%
Professor > Associate Professor 14 5%
Other 43 17%
Unknown 25 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 51 20%
Engineering 49 19%
Physics and Astronomy 34 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 30 12%
Mathematics 13 5%
Other 41 16%
Unknown 38 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 June 2016.
All research outputs
#8,759,452
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Statistical Physics
#238
of 2,074 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,393
of 14,580 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Statistical Physics
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,074 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 14,580 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.