↓ Skip to main content

Morphology and comparative ecology of the fairy ring fungi, Vascellum curtisii and Bovista dermoxantha, on turf of bentgrass, bluegrass, and Zoysiagrass

Overview of attention for article published in Mycoscience, August 2004
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
7 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
19 Mendeley
Title
Morphology and comparative ecology of the fairy ring fungi, Vascellum curtisii and Bovista dermoxantha, on turf of bentgrass, bluegrass, and Zoysiagrass
Published in
Mycoscience, August 2004
DOI 10.1007/s10267-004-0183-y
Authors

Yoshie Terashima, Toshimitsu Fukiharu, Azusa Fujiie

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Italy 1 5%
Brazil 1 5%
Unknown 17 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 5 26%
Other 3 16%
Researcher 3 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 16%
Student > Postgraduate 2 11%
Other 3 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 68%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 16%
Environmental Science 2 11%
Unknown 1 5%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 December 2018.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Mycoscience
#137
of 473 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,553
of 61,346 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Mycoscience
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 473 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 61,346 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them