↓ Skip to main content

Genetic Identification of Spotted Owls, Barred Owls, and Their Hybrids: Legal Implications of Hybrid Identity

Overview of attention for article published in Conservation Biology, September 2004
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
69 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
160 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Genetic Identification of Spotted Owls, Barred Owls, and Their Hybrids: Legal Implications of Hybrid Identity
Published in
Conservation Biology, September 2004
DOI 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2004.00206.x
Authors

SUSAN M. HAIG, THOMAS D. MULLINS, ERIC D. FORSMAN, PEPPER W. TRAIL, LIV WENNERBERG

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 160 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 3%
Brazil 4 3%
Portugal 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Unknown 146 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 35 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 16%
Student > Master 19 12%
Student > Bachelor 19 12%
Professor 10 6%
Other 31 19%
Unknown 21 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 104 65%
Environmental Science 19 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 8%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 <1%
Arts and Humanities 1 <1%
Other 2 1%
Unknown 21 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 August 2023.
All research outputs
#8,534,528
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Conservation Biology
#2,703
of 4,051 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,531
of 75,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Conservation Biology
#6
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,051 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.0. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 75,499 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.