↓ Skip to main content

Phonology in syntax: The Somali optional agreement rule

Overview of attention for article published in Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, September 1983
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
33 Mendeley
Title
Phonology in syntax: The Somali optional agreement rule
Published in
Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, September 1983
DOI 10.1007/bf00142471
Authors

Arnold M. Zwicky, Geoffrey K. Pullum

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 3%
Uganda 1 3%
Unknown 31 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 33%
Professor 5 15%
Student > Master 3 9%
Researcher 3 9%
Lecturer 2 6%
Other 5 15%
Unknown 4 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Linguistics 28 85%
Physics and Astronomy 1 3%
Social Sciences 1 3%
Unknown 3 9%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 April 2023.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Natural Language & Linguistic Theory
#60
of 332 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,213
of 8,011 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Natural Language & Linguistic Theory
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 332 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 8,011 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them