You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Shortfalls and Solutions for Meeting National and Global Conservation Area Targets
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Conservation Letters, February 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1111/conl.12158 |
| Authors |
Stuart H.M. Butchart, Martin Clarke, Robert J. Smith, Rachel E. Sykes, Jörn P.W. Scharlemann, Mike Harfoot, Graeme M. Buchanan, Ariadne Angulo, Andrew Balmford, Bastian Bertzky, Thomas M. Brooks, Kent E. Carpenter, Mia T. Comeros‐Raynal, John Cornell, G. Francesco Ficetola, Lincoln D.C. Fishpool, Richard A. Fuller, Jonas Geldmann, Heather Harwell, Craig Hilton‐Taylor, Michael Hoffmann, Ackbar Joolia, Lucas Joppa, Naomi Kingston, Ian May, Amy Milam, Beth Polidoro, Gina Ralph, Nadia Richman, Carlo Rondinini, Daniel B. Segan, Benjamin Skolnik, Mark D. Spalding, Simon N. Stuart, Andy Symes, Joseph Taylor, Piero Visconti, James E.M. Watson, Louisa Wood, Neil D. Burgess |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 139 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 31 | 22% |
| United States | 8 | 6% |
| Australia | 7 | 5% |
| Sweden | 4 | 3% |
| Colombia | 4 | 3% |
| France | 3 | 2% |
| Germany | 3 | 2% |
| Spain | 2 | 1% |
| Bosnia and Herzegovina | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 19 | 14% |
| Unknown | 56 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 99 | 71% |
| Scientists | 35 | 25% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 2% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 953 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Italy | 5 | <1% |
| Argentina | 3 | <1% |
| United States | 3 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | <1% |
| Portugal | 2 | <1% |
| Kenya | 2 | <1% |
| Brazil | 2 | <1% |
| Australia | 2 | <1% |
| Canada | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 10 | 1% |
| Unknown | 919 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 175 | 18% |
| Researcher | 171 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 155 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 88 | 9% |
| Other | 59 | 6% |
| Other | 130 | 14% |
| Unknown | 175 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 335 | 35% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 281 | 29% |
| Social Sciences | 37 | 4% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 29 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 13 | 1% |
| Other | 41 | 4% |
| Unknown | 217 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 212. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 February 2023.
All research outputs
#186,271
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Conservation Letters
#42
of 1,075 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,963
of 273,172 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Conservation Letters
#1
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,075 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 53.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 273,172 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them